Legal Opinion

King v. . Power Company

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 11, 1929PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBeogdeN, J.

There is no evidence tending to show that the boister saddle was defective or that it was not an appliance approved and in general use or in any particular an unsafe appliance; neither was there evidence that any negligent order had been given with respect to the operation thereof.

The evidence does not disclose whether the boister saddle fell or whether the plaintiff fell out of the saddle. Plaintiff testified that his fellow-servant, Lawrence, did not have hold of the rope “when I looked down to ask him to let me down. He was standing close to the rope, but he did not have his hands on it.”…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fore v. GearySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  2. Fore v. . GearySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Michaux v. R. G. Lassiter & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Miller v. Globe Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API