Legal Opinion

Gillis v. Curd

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 10, 1941No. 8419PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.

Appellants appeal from a decree denying them $1,740 or any part thereof, proceeds of a tract of land condemned by the United States for inclusion in the Cumberland National Forest.

In 1934, appellee, T. J. Curd, optioned to the United States, for $6 per acre, 354 acres of land in Whitley and McCreary Counties, Kentucky. The option was exercised and the land surveyed in two tracts, referred to in the record as tract 1408d, containing 303-acres, and tract 1408d-l, containing 51 acres. The latter tract is not in controversy.

Appellants claimed title to the lands, which were…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Burt & Brabb Lumber Co. v. SackettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  2. Louisville Cooperage Co. v. RuddCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  3. Martin v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  4. New York-Kentucky Oil & Gas Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  5. Whitley County Land Co. v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Howenstein Realty Corp. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  2. Moore v. StillsKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Moore v. StillsKentucky Supreme Court · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API