Legal Opinion · Dissent

Moore v. Stills

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 2010No. 2008-SC-000193-DGPublished

1DissentScott, Justice

I must respectfully dissent, as this is not a case of just giving “notice” via “recreational trespasses.” This is a case about flagging the entire boundary line of the claimed property with brightly-colored engineering flagging and “No Trespassing” signs which gave notice to anyone near, or, or about the property that it was the “private property” of the Appellees, who had continuously put up the flags and signs— not that of Appellants — who claimed most of the “disputed property” under quitclaim deeds their counsel drafted after the dispute began — and these deeds purported to recognize that…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Bierman v. KlaphekeKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Capital Holding Corp. v. BaileyKentucky Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Commonwealth Department of Agriculture v. VinsonKentucky Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Flinn v. BlakemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API