Legal Opinion
Hinton v. Pacific Enterprises
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 17, 1993No. 92-55493PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge:
Background
Plaintiff-appellant Hinton was a paralegal employed by defendant-appellee Pacific Enterprises (“Pacific”). On January 6, 1988, Hinton became disabled and on January 15, 1988, she was informed by her supervisor that she was being fired. Ten days later, she executed a resignation agreement outlining the terms of her departure from Pacific. Below her signature, in her own handwriting, Ms. Hinton added:
By signing this agreement, I understand that I do not give up my rights to seek reimbursement for disability under Worker’s Compensation, the Company’s…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Fuller v. M.G. JewelryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Stephen Yagman v. Republic Insurance Cna Insurance Valley Forge InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Elkins v. DerbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- M. D. Rutledge v. Boston Woven Hose and Rubber Company, a Division of American Biltrite, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Tom Hammon v. Dhl Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Edmond C. Teumer v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Arthur L. Serrano and Andrew W. Holman v. Telular CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Barton v. New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- Sutter v. First Union National Bank of Virginia, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.