Legal Opinion

Brown v. City of Portland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 27, 1996No. 9305-02878; CA A84750PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Petitioner Milton Brown petitioned for a writ of review of a decision of respondent City of Portland (City) assessing charges for nuisance abatement work performed by the City. The trial court affirmed the City’s decision, and petitioner appeals. ORS 34.100. We reverse and remand.

The facts are not disputed. Before describing them, however, it is necessary to set forth the legal framework for the actions of the parties.

The City has adopted a nuisance abatement ordinance, which describes the procedure by which it may determine that a nuisance exists and the steps that it may take to remedy it.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lincoln Loan Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Pacheco v. BlatchfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. Old Republic Surety Co. v. McIlwainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Walters v. Kmart Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. Reeves v. PlettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API