Legal Opinion

Reeves v. Plett

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 19, 2017No. 16LT00515; A161806PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLagesen, J.

Plaintiff landlord brought this forcible entry and wrongful detainer (FED) action to recover possession of residential premises that he rented to defendant tenants. See ORS 105.110; ORS 105.124. When landlord did not show up for trial, the trial court waited 33 minutes and then entered a judgment dismissing the case. Later, on landlord’s motion under ORCP 71 B(1), the trial court entered an order setting aside that judgment of dismissal on the ground that it resulted from “mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect.” Tenants appeal that order, asserting that the trial court erred…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gaona v. BLACKETTEROregon Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Wagar v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Hiatt v. Congoleum Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Union Lumber Co. v. Miller​​​​​Oregon Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Mary Ebel Johnson, P.C. v. ElmoreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wetzel v. SandlowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  2. Michael v. PugelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. Reeves v. FarberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  4. Winn v. Blakeslee Vineyard Estate, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API