State v. Dunston
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.
At the threshold of this case we are confronted with a fatally defective count in bill of indictment No. 6408, charging the defendant with resisting an officer. The bill of indictment is defective in that it does not allege all the facts necessary to constitute an offense under G.S. 14-223. Here, as in the case of S. v. Stonestreet, 243 N.C. 28, 89 S.E. 2d 734, the bill fails to charge the official duty the named officer was discharging or attempting to discharge. S. v. Harvey, 242 N.C. 111, 86 S.E. 2d 793; S. v. Eason, 242 N.C. 59, 86 S.E. 2d 774.
It is the duty of this Court to carefully…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. . CombsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- State v. . JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
- State v. EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. GuffeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. SossamonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- State v. KirbyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- State v. EllisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.