Legal Opinion

Barlow v. Cotulla

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1915No. 2359PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals, Fourth District, in an appeal from LaSalle County. Cotulla sued Barlow and recovered. The latter obtained writ of error on affirmance of the judgment on his appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Phillips

Cotulla being indebted to Barlow in a large sum, secured by a lien upon land, sold a tract of the land to Hargus, receiving as part of the consideration the latter’s vendor’s lien note for $2596.15, payable to- his order, three years after date, bearing 8 per cent interest. Cotulla transferred this note to Barlow a few days after he received it, upon a verbal agreement with Barlow, as he contended upon the trial, that its principal and interest, when collected, should be applied upon his indebtedness to Barlow, .and that in consideration for such transfer the latter would release his lien…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Independent Eastern Torpedo Co. v. HerringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Panhandle Refining Co. v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Szanto v. PagelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Moore-Seaver Grain Co. v. Blum Milling Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Sawyer v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API