Legal Opinion

Szanto v. Pagel

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 17, 1932No. 7680PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

The parties will be designated herein as appellants and appellee.

Appellants, John Szanto and W. R. Rogers, sued appellee, H. A. Pagel, to recover $1,700 as stipulated damages for the breach of a written contract for the exchange of certain lands, executed by Szanto and Pagel, and providing that $000 of such damages should be paid appellant Rogers, who acted as broker for both parties in procuring the contract. The contract required Szanto to furnish an abstract showing a “good merchantable title” in himself to the land he was agreeing to convey Pagel. A trial to the court without a jury…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HendricksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  2. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
  3. Owens v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Ferguson v. MountsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Baldridge v. CookTexas Supreme Court · 1864

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cox v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
  2. McRae v. Lindale Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  3. Sidran v. Western Textile Products Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  4. West Texas Utilities Co. v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. The Texas Pacific Coal and Oil Company v. Honolulu Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API