Legal Opinion

George v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF STATE OF COLO.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided June 2, 1986No. 84CA0568PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TURSI, Judge.

Claimant, Phillip George, seeks review of a final order of the Industrial Commission denying his petition to reopen. We affirm in part, set aside the order in part, and remand for further proceedings.

Claimant filed a claim for compensation in 1977, stating that he had been employed since 1961 operating rock crushers in Colorado uranium mines and that he had developed silicosis.

It was determined that claimant had silicosis and was industrially disabled from the occupation of mining. However, the Industrial Commission concluded that claimant’s disability for manual labor because of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Allmendinger v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Timberline Sawmill & Lumber Inc. v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Zuzich v. Leyden Lignite Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  4. Lucero v. Climax Molybdenum Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Riddle v. Ampex Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. State Compensation Insurance Authority v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Ward v. WardColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Beatrice Foods Co. v. PadillaColorado Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. CAN-USA Construction, Inc. v. GerberColorado Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API