Legal Opinion

Lucero v. Climax Molybdenum Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 29, 1985No. 84CA0839PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENOCH, Chief Judge.

Claimant, Antonio Lucero, seeks review of a final order of the Industrial Commission denying his petition to reopen. We affirm.

Claimant suffered a compensable injury while employed by Climax Molybdenum Company (employer) in 1979. Employer filed an admission of liability for permanent partial disability in 1981. Claimant continued working for employer as a light duty worker in its engineering department and later as a janitor, for which he was paid at the same salary rate, although he actually received less pay because of a different work schedule.

*1192In September 1982 employer…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Compensation of Harris v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. National Zinc Company v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  3. Royal Indemnity Co. v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  4. Sterling v. Industrial Com'n of StateColorado Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lucero v. Climax Molybdenum Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. Chavez v. INDUS. COM'N OF STATE OF COLO.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. George v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF STATE OF COLO.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Brasher v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Justiniano v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API