Legal Opinion

Washington ex rel. Markham v. Seattle & R. V. Ry. Co.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided September 25, 1924No. 8741PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUSHMAN, District Judge.

This suit was removed from the state court, and plaintiffs move to remand. The plaintiffs are owners of property abutting on Rainier avenue in the city of Seattle, along which avenue, and other streets, the defendant owns and operates a street railway under certain ordinances of the city of Seattle, providing, among other things, that the holders of such franchise should paye and repave within and between all tracks thereof and for 1% feet on each side of the tracks on any and all streets over which the lines authorized by the ordinance shall extend. Under ordinances…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re LennonSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. State ex rel. City of Seattle v. Seattle & Rainier Valley Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Washington ex rel. City of Tacoma v. Tacoma Ry. & Power Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1910
  4. Washington ex rel. City of Seattle v. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Minnesota v. Chicago, M., St. P. & P. R.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1931
  2. Johnson v. Interstate Power CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1960
  3. Harrelson v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Nolen v. Ware Trust Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API