Harrelson v. City of Fayetteville
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
The proposed franchise ordinance was adjudged void solely on the ground “it exceeds the authority of the City of Fayetteville, either express or implied.” This is the ground on which it was attacked by plaintiffs. It was not challenged as unconstitutional in any respect.
The City Council has not adopted any franchise ordinance. In the resolution adopted December 29, 1966, it set forth its finding “that there is a real need for, and that the public interests and convenience require, an Airport limousine service between the Fayette-ville Municipal Airport (Grannis Field) and the City of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Rhodes v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Turner v. . ReidsvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Miami Beach Airline Service, Inc. v. CrandonSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
- State v. CamelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Airport Authority v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pinehurst Airlines, Inc. v. Resort Air Services, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1979
- Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. City of Chicago, and Continental Air Transport Company, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
- Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority v. StewartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970