Schwartz v. Schwartz
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.
Upon reviewing the record we are convinced that the evidence not only warranted the jury’s findings, but entitled plaintiff to a directed verdict on the issues submitted. There is no substantial conflict in the evidence as to the crucial facts involved in the determination of those issues. It is not sufficient for the issuance of a warrant, under sec. 362.03, Stats., that there has been an utterance of a threat to commit an offense against the property or person of another. It must appear upon examination by the magistrate, before the warrant can be issued, “that there is just cause to fear…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- White v. International Text Book Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Watkins v. BairdMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1810
- Lyons v. Davy-Pocahontas Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
- Robbins v. . RobbinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Eggett v. AllenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- De Vries v. DyeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Scaffido v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Blase v. AppicelliMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Greenberg v. Cutler-Hammer, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1975
- Petrie v. RobertsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.