Petrie v. Roberts
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBarlow, J.
This case must be examined by giving due consideration to the established law that an action for malicious prosecution can be maintained only when the defendant was actuated by malice and acting without probable cause to believe the accused guilty. Small v. McGovern, 117 Wis. 608, 94 N. W. 651; Spain v. Howe, 25 Wis. 625; Collins v. Shannon, 67 Wis. 441, 446, 30 N. W. 730; Messman v. Ihlenfeldt, 89 Wis. 585, 591, 62 N. W. 522; Strehlow v. Pettit, 96 Wis. 22, 28, 71 N. W. 102; Eggett v. Allen, 106 Wis. 633, 637, 82 N. W. 556; Lauterbach v. Netzo, 111 Wis. 326, 332, 87 N. W. 229.
The facts are…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Topolewski v. Plankinton Packing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- Murphy v. MartinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
- King v. Apple River Power Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
- Eggett v. AllenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Eggett v. AllenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Elmer v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1950
- Hanson v. HalvorsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
- Kaarup v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Marco v. WhitingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944