Legal Opinion

United States v. Phillip Darrell Smith, Ronalda Smith, and One 1978 Pontiac Bonneville

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 8, 1984No. 81-5574, 81-5781PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge.

Phillip and Ronalda Smith, the appellants in this consolidated appeal, seek a reversal of their jury conviction for unlawful distribution of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (2) and 846. 1 They also appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in a forfeiture action pertaining to their automobile which was seized after their arrests. We hold that the evidence admitted against Phillip and Ronalda Smith during the trial was lawfully seized pursuant to a valid search warrant and therefore affirm their convictions. However, we reverse…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Isaac L. James, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  4. United States v. One 1976 Mercedes Benz 280S, Serial No. 11602012072193Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  5. United States v. GrunsfeldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. BrownTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Simmons v. PoeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  3. N.A.A.C.P., Detroit Branch v. Detroit Police Officers Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  4. State v. CopelandNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. United States v. Andre Jenkins Nathaniel S. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API