Legal Opinion

United States v. Andre Jenkins Nathaniel S. Thompson

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 28, 2005No. 03-3989PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIBBONS, Circuit Judge.

Defendants-appellees Andre Jenkins and Nathaniel Thompson, charged with possession with intent to distribute cocaine, moved to suppress evidence obtained during two searches. The district court granted the defendants-appellees’ motions, and the government appeals. The government argues that the district court erred in suppressing the evidence, as the evidence is admissible under the independent source doctrine, under the good faith exception to the warrant requirement, or because it was obtained through a search based on a valid warrant. For the reasons set forth below,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. United States v. Christopher FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. Michael L. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. MasterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. DessesaureCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. SotoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API