Legal Opinion

In Re: Brad Bradley Bradford

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided July 27, 2016No. 16-14512-JPublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BY THE PANEL:

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2255(h) and 2244(b)(3)(A), Brad Bradford has filed a counseled application seeking an order authorizing the district court to consider a second or successive motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his federal sentence, 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Such authorization may be granted only if this Court certifies that the second or successive motion contains a claim involving:(1) newly discovered evidence that, if proven and viewed in light of the evidence as a whole, would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder would…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  3. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Burton v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Welch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. In Re: Wissam HammoudCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  2. Douglas Bourdon v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  3. Zurich American Insurance Co. v. Southern-Owners Insurance Co.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2017
  4. In re: Kenneth GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
  5. United States v. Michael St. HubertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API