Legal Opinion

Pitts v. Howard

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 2, 1922No. 2 Div. 787PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCEEELAN, J.

Having the advantage of ap inspection of the will itself, the court below made these observations with respect to its structure:

“And it appearing to the satisfaction of the court from the evidence in this cause that the will of Robert Isaac Van Hook was written by testator himself without legal aid or advice; that the same is written in the handwriting of testator; that there is little and insufficient punctuation therein; that there are therein numerous erasures, corrections, at least two interlineations, and one omission of the final syllable of a word; that at least one piece of testator’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ford v. Ford's Adm'rSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  2. Platt v. BrannanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
  3. Connell v. ColeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  4. Sewell v. SewellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Powell v. PearsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. First Nat. Bank v. CashSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. McGlathery v. MeeksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Knapp v. KnappSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  5. Arrington v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API