Legal Opinion

McGlathery v. Meeks

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 21, 1929No. 7 Div. 832PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

The bill is' for the sale of lands for division among tenants in common. Complainant, Hugh W. McGlathery, claims a statutory life estate by the curtesy as surviving husband of Nellie Meeks McGlathery, deceased. The theory of the bill is that Mrs. McGlathery, at the time of her death, was a tenant in common with her brothers, owning a vested interest under the will of her father, Wm. M. Meeks, deceased, and that, upon her death intestate, her husband took a life estate in her undivided interest, with reversion in her surviving children.

In such event complainant is entitled to maintain the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Goebel v. . WolfNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Pearce v. PearceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Duncan v. De YampertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  4. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  5. Burleson v. MaysSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wright v. City of TuscaloosaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. Shrout v. SealeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  3. White v. FowlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  4. Betts v. RenfroSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. Abrahams v. AbrahamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API