Legal Opinion

Swinney v. Atlanta Casualty Co.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 19, 1993No. CA 92-990PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judith Rogers, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order granting summary judgment in favor of Atlanta Casualty Co., appellee. On appeal, appellant contends that summary judgment was inappropriate because a genuine issue of fact existed. We find merit in appellant’s argument, and reverse.

Appellant apparently obtained auto insurance on his truck on August 2, 1991, from appellee. On September 19, 1991, appellant was involved in a one-vehicle accident. He presented a claim under the policy; however, appellee denied coverage contending that the policy had been canceled effective September 18, 1991.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harvison v. Charles E. Davis & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Cash v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  3. Swink & Co. v. Carroll McEntee & McGinley, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  4. Harrison v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
  5. McAnally v. Farm Bureau InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wozniak v. Colonial InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API