Swink & Co. v. Carroll McEntee & McGinley, Inc.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
John A. Fogleman, Justice.
This litigation arose from dealings in securities in the form of interest-bearing obligations issued by federal agencies in the form of bonds or notes guaranteed by the United States. Carroll McEntee & McGinley, Inc., to which we will refer as McEntee, a corporation with its principal office in New York, is engaged in the purchase and sale of those securities. Swink & Company, Inc., an Arkansas corporation, to which we will refer as Swink, is licensed as a broker-dealer to engage in the sale of municipal and United States government agency issues. McEntee brought…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Leasing Associates, Inc. v. Slaughter & Son, Inc., and F. E. Slaughter, as GuarantorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- Neal v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
- Tabor & Co. v. GorenzAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
- Betnar v. RoseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
- Southern Engine & Boiler Works v. VaughanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Board of County Commissioners v. Coleman American Properties, Inc. (In Re American Properties, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 1983
- Phillips v. Riverside, Inc.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1992
- Public Finance Co. v. Van BlaricomeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
- Dedman v. PorchSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- Federal Kemper Life Assurance Co. v. EllisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.