Legal Opinion

Lipinsky v. Hufft

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1975PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBryson, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover the balance due under the terms of a contract to remodel a building. Defendant’s motions for a nonsuit and a directed verdict were denied, and the jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff. On defendant’s motion the court set aside the judgment and entered judgment in favor of the defendant n.o.v. Plaintiff appeals, contending the trial court erred in granting the judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. The plaintiff is entitled to the benefit of all favorable evidence and all…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Krause v. Eugene Dodge, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Austin v. Sisters of Charity of ProvidenceOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Davis v. Bush & Lane Piano Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. Tidewater Barge Lines, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Green v. Uncle Don's Mobile CityOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Gardner v. First Escrow Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  4. King v. All Pro Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. Blank v. Far West Federal SavingsOregon Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API