Town of Fishkill v. Royal Dutchess Properties, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In an action for a judgment declaring, inter alia, that the premises commonly known as the Dutchess Mall is subject to taxes, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), entered August 25, 1995, which granted the motion of the defendants Royal Dutchess Properties, Inc., Carl McCall, and the Common Retirement Fund, to convert the action to a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 and to change the venue of the proceeding from the County of Dutchess to the County of Albany.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
"It is firmly established that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Morgenthau v. ErlbaumNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- First National City Bank v. City of New York Finance AdministrationNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Vantage Petroleum, Bay Isle Oil Co., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessment Review of the Town of BabylonNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Greystone Mgmt. Corp. v. Conciliation & Appeals Bd. of the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Posner v. RockefellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dandomar Co. v. Town of Pleasant Valley Town BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Walsh v. New York State Thruway AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Huntley v. EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Matter of 7-Eleven, Inc. v. Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Shipman v. City of New York Support Collection UnitNew York Supreme Court · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.