Dandomar Co. v. Town of Pleasant Valley Town Board
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*85OPINION OF THE COURT
Dillon, J.P.
Petitions seeking the remedy of mandamus and prohibition under CPLR article 78 are subject to a four-month statute of limitations (see CPLR 217; Matter of Holtzman v Goldman, 71 NY2d 564, 568 [1988]; Matter of Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v Town Bd. of the Town of Southeast, 70 AD3d 824, 825 [2010]). Actions or proceedings involving the abandonment of highways are subject to a one-year statute of limitations (see Highway Law § 205 [2]). Here, we address whether a petitioner seeking to annul a municipality’s certificate of abandonment for a highway must commence the…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Holtzman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Solnick v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Enco Associates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v. City of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Becker-Manning, Inc. v. Common CouncilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- QK Healthcare, Inc. v. InSource, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Dormer v. Suffolk County Police Benevolent Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Dolce-Richard v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matter of McCrory v. Village of Mamaroneck Bd. of TrusteesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.