Legal Opinion
Greystone Mgmt. Corp. v. Conciliation & Appeals Bd. of the City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 1, 1984PublishedCited by 46 opinions
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order affirmed, with costs. It cannot be said that the Appellate Division abused its discretion in refusing to grant declaratory relief in this case (Bower & Gardner v Evans, 60 NY2d 781). Generally, a declaratory judgment action is not the proper vehicle to challenge an administrative procedure, where judicial review by way of article 78 proceeding is available.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wacht-ler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur.
Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bower & Gardner v. EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
3Cited by46 opinions
- Tockwotten Associates v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Davis v. Waterside Housing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Villas of Forest Hills Co. v. LumbergerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Church v. WingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Nelson v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.