Legal Opinion

Cahnmann v. Eckerty

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 22, 1976No. 13060PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Simkins

The facts of this case are simply stated. Plaintiff Cahnmann resided in Urbana from September 1971, until March 1973. After a year of study overseas, he moved to Champaign in August 1973. In August of 1974, he moved back to Urbana. In December he filed nomination papers to run as alderman but a Municipal Officers Electoral Board declared him ineligible because he did not meet the one-year residency requirement of section 3 — 14—1 of the Municipal Code (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 24, par. 3 — 14—1). The circuit court affirmed. Plaintiff argues that the residency requirement violates the Equal…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Bullock v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. GuestSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Chimento v. StarkDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cinkus v. Village of Stickney Municipal Officers Electoral BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Labor's Educational & Political Club-Independent v. DanforthSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  3. White v. ManchinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Castner v. City of HomerAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Cinkus v. Village of Stickney Municipal Officers Electoral BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API