Legal Opinion
Quanah, Acme & Pacific Ry. Co. v. Wichita State Bank & Trust Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided April 19, 1933No. 4007PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Justice.
The action of the trial court in sustaining appellee’s general demurrer is the only question presented for review.
Appellant’s petition is lengthy. To conserve space we reproduce literally only so much of it as we deem necessary. Appellant is a railroad corporation, operating out of the city of Quanah, and has been since about the year 1909. From 1909 until about September, 1931, it had in its employment one T. K. Hawkins as its treasurer and auditor “whose duty was to collect and deposit all moneys and revenues arising from such business to plaintiff’s credit in its depository…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Bischoff v. . Yorkville BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Union Stock Yards Bank v. GillespieSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Ward v. City Trust Co. of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Van Alen v. . American National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Quanah, Acme & Pacific Railway Co. v. Wichita State Bank & Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
- Wichita Royalty Co. v. City National Bank of Wichita FallsTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Wichita Royalty Co. v. City Nat. Bank of Wichita FallsTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Quanah, A. & P. Ry. Co. v. Wichita State Bank & Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
- Wichita Royalty Co. v. City Nat. Bank of Wichita FallsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933