Legal Opinion
Quanah, A. & P. Ry. Co. v. Wichita State Bank & Trust Co.
Texas Supreme Court
Decided December 11, 1935No. 6744PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GERMAN, Commissioner.
The Quanah, Acme & Pacific Railway Company, herein called plaintiff, brought this suit against Wichita State Bank & Trust Company, herein called defendant, and another, with whom we ate no longer concerned. The plaintiff sought to recover of the bank a large sum of money on the theory of conversion, or upon the theory that it had aided and assisted one T. K. Hawkins in a misappropriation of said money, by crediting to the personal account of said Hawkins checks belonging to plaintiff, under circumstances which charged defendant with notice that Hawkins had misappropriated…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Bischoff v. . Yorkville BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Ward v. City Trust Co. of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- Duckett v. National Mechanics' BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897
- Wen Kroy Realty Co. v. Public National Bank & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Cheever v. Pittsburgh, Shenango & Lake Erie RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wichita Royalty Co. v. City National Bank of Wichita FallsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Quanah, Acme & Pacific Railway Co. v. Wichita State Bank & Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
- Wichita Royalty Co. v. City National Bank of Wichita FallsTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Wichita Royalty Co. v. City Nat. Bank of Wichita FallsTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- Wichita Royalty Co. v. City Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.