Legal Opinion

Smith v. North Jersey Street Railway Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 26, 1906PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On rule to show cause why a verdict in favor of the plaintiff should not be set aside.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fort, J.

The plaintiff, a child of eight years and six months of age, brings this suit, by her next friend, to recover for alleged injuries received upon the public highway in Jersey City by being run down by a trolley car of the defendant company.

*296The evidence showed that the child started to run across the street and ran over the tracks of the defendant company, and something frightened her and she turned back, when, as she thus turned toward the track, the car fender hit her.

She was, under the proof, in full view of the motorman.

The ear was going,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stone v. Dry Dock, East Broadway & Battery RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Consolidated Traction Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
  3. Fitzhenry v. Consolidated Traction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1900

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hellstern v. SmelowitzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  2. Williams v. New Jersey-New York Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  3. David v. West Jersey & Seashore RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
  4. Arivabeno ex rel. Arivabeno v. NuseSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API