Legal Opinion
Lent v. Employment Relations Board
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 8, 1983No. 136338 CA A27426PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.
The plaintiff in this declaratory judgment action is the Chief Justice of the Oregon Supreme Court and administrative head of the Judicial Department of the state government. He contends that his labor relations with employes of the Judicial Department are not subject to the Public Employe Collective Bargaining Act (PECBA) (ORS 243.650 et seq.), because (1) his authority under ORS 1.002 and 1.008 1 is inconsistent with and prevails over the provisions of PECBA and (2) the separation of powers section of the Oregon Constitution, Article III, § 1, prohibits the legislature and the Employment…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Application of Portland General Elec. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Bay River, Inc. v. Environmental Quality CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- City of Hermiston v. Employment Relations BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Klamath Cty. v. Laborers Int. U. of Na, Loc. No. 915Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
- City of Hermiston v. Employment Relations BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Reynolds v. State Board of Naturopathic ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- AFSCME Council 75, Local 350 v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Bowen v. Public Employees Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Reynolds v. State Board of Naturopathic ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986