Legal Opinion

Smith v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 29, 1939PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDolan, J.

This is an action of tort to recover compensation for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff. The case was tried to a jury and at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence the judge allowed the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict, and reported the case for the determination of this court upon a stipulation that if his action was right judgment is to be entered on the verdict, and otherwise that judgment is to be entered for the plaintiff in the sum of $3,750.

The evidence in its aspects most favorable to the plaintiff would have warranted the jury in finding the following facts: The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Will v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  3. Scherer v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  4. Daignault v. Berkshire Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  5. Callahan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ruane v. DoyleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. Mroczek v. CraigMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  3. Norton v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  4. Hebert v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API