Smith v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtDolan, J.
This is an action of tort to recover compensation for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff. The case was tried to a jury and at the close of the plaintiff’s evidence the judge allowed the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict, and reported the case for the determination of this court upon a stipulation that if his action was right judgment is to be entered on the verdict, and otherwise that judgment is to be entered for the plaintiff in the sum of $3,750.
The evidence in its aspects most favorable to the plaintiff would have warranted the jury in finding the following facts: The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sullivan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Will v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Scherer v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Daignault v. Berkshire Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Callahan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ruane v. DoyleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Mroczek v. CraigMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Norton v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Hebert v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1974