Legal Opinion
Collins v. Wayland
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided July 15, 1942No. Civil No. 4427PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
— The principal question for decision is whether a 20-foot strip running north and south through Block 1, Churchill’s Addition to the City of Phoenix, between Van Burén and Polk Streets, is a public alley or is privately owned.
The appellees W. R. Wayland, Fred G. Holmes, Consolidated Motors, Inc., the City of Phoenix and C. Claude Dye insist that such strip,is and was a public alley, dedicated to the public use, whereas appellants James Dean Collins, Hattie L. Mosher and Julia C. Collins, claim title to said strip is in them or one of them. The trial court found the issues thus made in favor…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Skinner v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1939
- Collins v. CollinsArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- Kuhn v. City of Port TownsendWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Chaves v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
- Mason v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Allied American Inv. Co. v. PettitArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- Finucane v. Village of HaydenIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
- City of Flagstaff v. BabbittCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Edwards v. SheetsArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- City of Flagstaff v. BabbittCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.