Legal Opinion

State v. Hays

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 14, 2010No. 06117943C; A135729PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for misdemeanor driving under the influence of intoxicants (DUII), ORS 813.010(4). Defendant contends that the trial court erred in failing to suppress evidence of a chemical breath test of intoxication, arguing that his consent to take that test was unlawfully obtained. We affirm the judgment because the evidence of the breath test is admissible even if defendant’s consent resulted from unlawful police actions.

We review the denial of a motion to suppress for errors of law and are bound by the trial court’s factual findings that are supported by…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. BridewellOregon Supreme Court · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API