Legal Opinion

Briscoe v. Eckley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1876PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Lapeer Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

^Graves, J.:

Eckley recovered below for services and supplies to tbe plaintiffs in error, who were jobbers on the Detroit & Bay City Railroad, and also recovered upon several claims for labor, assigned to him. The plaintiffs in error had contracted to build a portion of the road, and had sublet a portion of the grading covered by their contract to Howard, Halstead & Co. Eckley had entered into the service of these sub-contractors, and a number of men had begun work for them. In the course of a few days there was disagreement between the men and the sub-contractors. Eckley claimed that he then…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bronner v. . FrauenthalNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  2. Langdon v. HughesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bay County Bar Ass'n v. Finance System, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Swan v. GregoryMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Donovan v. Halsey Fire Engine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Lyon v. ChamberlainMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Block v. BrackettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API