Bronner v. . Frauenthal
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiffs, composing the firm of Bronner Brother, seek to recover in this action the amount of a bill of goods which they claim they sold to the defendant. The defendant, on the contrary, claims that the goods were sold to one Samuel Lowenstein.
Sechel Bronner, one of the plaintiffs, testified, without objection, that on the day the goods were sold to the defendant, he refused to sell the goods to said Lowenstein, and that Nathaniel C. Bishop had at that time told him not to trust said Lowenstein, because he was not responsible.
The said Bishop was then called as a witness on behalf of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Nixon v. PalmerNew York Supreme Court · 1850
3Cited by10 opinions
- Tiemeyer v. . TurnquistNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Holmes v. . RoperNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Hill v. RobinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Briscoe v. EckleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Krieger v. KayeAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1900
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.