Legal Opinion
Regency Condominium Ass'n v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 14, 1987No. CX-86-1573PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COYNE, Justice.
We review on certiorari the decision of the tax court declaring that petitioner Regency Condominium Association lacks standing to bring a single action to determine the validity of its' claim that the Regency, a condominium which comprises 94 units, has been unfairly, inequitably, and unequally assessed at a valuation greater than its real value. We reverse.
A condominium is real estate, portions of which are designated as units for separate ownership and the remainder of which is designated for common ownership solely by the owners of the units; undivided interest in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gau v. HylandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Minnesota Public Interest Research Group v. Minnesota Department of Labor & IndustrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- International Harvester Co. v. State Bennett Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
3Cited by10 opinions
- Odunlade v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Schober v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Chapman Place Ass'n, Inc. v. ProkaskyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. KnutsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Federated Retail Holdings, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.