Legal Opinion

Nott v. Folsom

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 9, 1958PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEINFELD, District Judge.

These are cross-motions for summary judgment in an action instituted by the plaintiff to recover widow’s benefits under the provisions of the Social Security Act. 1 The parties agree there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the matter is ripe for disposition under the summary judgment rule.

The issue presented is one of novel impression in this District — whether a widow admittedly entitled to benefits under the Act, who enters into a remarriage which is annulled for fraud, is reinstated to her prior status as a widow so as to entitle her to benefit payments…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. De Sylva v. BallentineSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Sleicher v. SleicherNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Gaines v. JacobsenNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  4. Ewing v. RisherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
  5. Johnson v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1946

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Littlefield v. State, Department of Human ServicesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  2. Sophie Nott v. Arthur Flemming, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  3. Lillian R. Yeager v. Arthur S. Flemming, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  4. Denberg v. FrischmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  5. Helen I. Gloss v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API