Gutmann v. Klimek
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for St. Louis county to recover $1,~ 521.77, the price of certain merchandise. The case was tried before-Ensign, J., and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of defendants. From an order denying plaintiffs’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, and from the judgment entered pursuant to the verdict, plaintiffs appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.
The plaintiffs brought this action to recover the purchase price of merchandise. The defendants admitted the purchase of the merchandise, but alleged an agreement that the purchase price was not to be-paid until July 1, 1912. The reply denied the making of such agreement. TJpon the issue so raised a trial was had, resulting in a verdict for the defendants. Alternative motions, made by the plaintiffs, for judgment or a new trial were denied. From such order an appeal' was taken to this court. No supersedeas bond having been given, judgment was thereafter entered upon the verdict in defendant’s…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Minneapolis Mill Co. v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Stein v. SwensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Bolles v. CarliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1866
- Hill v. WinstonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- King v. McCarthySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Clark v. WolkoffSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Reese v. Ross & Ross Auctioneers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Schall v. Northland Motor Car Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Haack v. CoughlanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916