United States v. Mabe

The Court has concluded that Chief Judge Garvin’s memorandum to Circuit Judge Henderson (herein referred to as the “Henderson memorandum”) subjected each of the judges of the Transatlantic Judicial Circuit, as well as the visiting judge who presided over this case, to unlawful command influence. Its conclusion differs from that reached by Colonel Mitchell, whom the Court characterizes as “the sole designee to a Judicial Commission appointed by the Judge Advocate General to investigate this matter,” who opined that Chief Judge Garvin had not violated Article 37 nor any other article of the…