Town of Ellettsville, Indiana Plan Commission and Richland Convenience Store Partners, LLC
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Slaughter, Justice.
We adhere to Indiana's longstanding common-law rule that relocating a fixed easement requires the consent of all affected estate-holders. And we reject the minority approach, reflected in the Third Restatement of Property (Servitudes), which permits the unilateral relocation of easements if a court finds the proposed relocation is "reasonable", consistent with the "normal" use and development of the servient estate, and does not adversely affect the dominant estate. Property rights in Indiana are not so flimsy that they may be modified or eliminated if their exercise…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. Florida Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Lewis v. YoungNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Michael Ryan v. TCI Architects/Engineers/Contractors, Inc. and BMH Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Craft MechanicalIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
- M.P.M. Builders, LLC v. DwyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- AKG REAL ESTATE, LLC v. KostermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bart M. Betteau v. Robert Headrick and Karen Headrick (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Zayo Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2026
- Close Armstrong LLC v. Trunkline Gas CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2020
- Close Armstrong LLC v. Trunkline Gas CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2023
- Close Armstrong, LLC v. Trunkline Gas Company, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2026
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.