Legal Opinion
Sa v. Superior Ct. in and for Cty. of Maricopa
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided June 2, 1992No. 1 CA-SA 91-265PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EHRLICH, Presiding Judge.
S.A. (“petitioner”) 1 was arrested following her refusal to honor a subpoena requiring her to testify at a criminal proceeding against Atwell Beatty. Her refusal was based upon her understanding of the Victims’ Bill of Rights. The trial court ordered her to testify and she filed a petition for special action. We accepted jurisdiction and denied relief with this opinion to follow.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The petitioner is alleged to be a victim of criminal offenses perpetrated by Beatty. At the direction of the prosecution, she was served a subpoena directing…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State Ex Rel. Collins v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. RiggsArizona Supreme Court · 1997
- State Ex Rel. Romley v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- Empress Adult Video & Bookstore v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Wozniak v. GalatiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- State v. RiggsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.