Legal Opinion

Milliken v. Jacono

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 26, 2012PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E.:

Janet S. Milliken (“Buyer”) appeals from the order granting summary judgment in favor of Kathleen and Joseph Jacono (“Sellers”) and their agents, Fran Day and Thomas O’Neil, employed by the Caseia Corporation, trading as RE/MAX Town & Country (“Agents”).1 Buyer claims that the trial court erred in granting Sellers’ and Agents’ motions for summary judgment on several claims arising from the 2007 sale of a house to Buyer without Sellers or Agents disclosing to Buyer that a murder/suicide of a husband and wife had occurred in the house in 2006. Finding no error, we…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blumenstock v. GibsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Bennett v. A.T. Masterpiece Homes at Broadsprings, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Youndt v. First National Bank of Port AlleganySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Skurnowicz v. LucciSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Daley v. A.W. Chesterton, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Weissberger v. MyersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Richards, R. v. Ameriprise FinancialSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Koller Concrete, Inc. v. Tube City IMS, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  4. Phelps, N. v. Caperoon, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Milliken v. JaconoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API