Legal Opinion

Koller Concrete, Inc. v. Tube City IMS, LLC

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 2015No. 2028 EDA 2014PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY DONOHUE, J.:

Tube City, LLC (“Tube City”) appeals from the judgment entered in the amount of $34,7138.39 for Appellee, Roller Concrete, Inc. (“Roller”). Following our review, we affirm.

The basic facts underlying this appeal are as follows. Roller produces concrete for contractors to use in commercial and residential projects. 1 Roller blends concrete for its customers to meet the specific requirements of each particular job. In 1995, Roller began to purchase a particular cement, Waycem, from Tube City for use in its concrete mixtures. Roller found that Waycem added strength to its…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KravitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Commonwealth v. HudsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Commonwealth v. CountermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Ferrer v. Trustees of the University of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Commonwealth v. SantiagoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In Re: B. Fiedler, Appeal of: E. FiedlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Brewer, J. v. Andrews, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Donner Financial Group v. Auto TagsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Ecker, E. v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Fraser, M. v. O'Black, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API