Legal Opinion
Amore v. Ohio Turnpike Commission
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 20, 2011No. 25227PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mooke, Judge.
{¶ 1} Appellant, the Ohio Turnpike Commission, appeals the judgment of the Summit County Court of Common Pleas, General Division. This court affirms.
I
{¶ 2} In 1984, Christopher and Patricia Amore purchased the property located at 1600 Woodland Drive in Peninsula, Ohio. In 1997, the Ohio Turnpike Commission began a maintenance and construction project involving a portion of the turnpike adjacent to the Amores’ property. The construction increased the number of travel lanes eastbound and westbound. This involved removing several trees that stood between the Amores’ home and the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Joyce v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
- Osler v. City of LorainOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Taylor v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Continental Insurance v. WhittingtonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Long v. Hanging RockOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
- Nottke v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2017
- Pietrangelo v. PolyOne Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
- Gibson Bros., Inc. v. Oberlin CollegeOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Diplomate Health Care, L.L.C. v. CouryOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.