Legal Opinion
Pietrangelo v. PolyOne Corp.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 6, 2021No. 21CA011734PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as Pietrangelo v. PolyOne Corp.,
2021-Ohio-4239.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF LORAIN ) JAMES E. PIETRANGELO, II C.A. No. 21CA011734 Appellant v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE POLYONE CORPORATION, et al. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF LORAIN, OHIO Appellees CASE No. 17CV192741 DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY Dated: December 6, 2021 CALLAHAN, Judge. {¶1} Appellant, James Pietrangelo, appeals orders of the Lorain County Court of Common Pleas that granted summary judgment to appellees, The Lubrizol Corporation (“Lubrizol”) and PolyOne…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. PayneOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- James v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025
- Lantz v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
- Petranek v. SalayOhio Court of Appeals · 2024