Legal Opinion
At & T CORP. v. City of Portland
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided June 3, 1999No. CV 99-65-PAPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PANNER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs AT & T Corp., Tele-Communi-cations Inc. (TCI), TCI Cablevision of Oregon, Inc., and TCI of Southern Washington, bring this action for declaratory relief against defendants City of Portland and Multnomah County, and intervenor-defen-dants U S West Interprise America, Inc., GTE Internetworking Inc., Oregon Internet Service Provider Association, and OGC Telecomm, Ltd. Plaintiffs challenge a City ordinance and a County resolution requiring that AT & T allow Internet service providers (ISPs) not affiliated with AT & T to connect their equipment directly to…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- AT&T Corp. v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- At&T Corporation v. City Of PortlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000