Legal Opinion

United Telephone Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 20, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Judge.

The United Telephone Company of Pennsylvania (United) appeals from a final order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) directing United to allow staff in the PUC’s Bureau of Consumer Service (BCS)1 to monitor United’s customer service *1246and collection representatives during telephone conversations with United’s customers, without requiring authorization from United employees, but with express customer authorization.

The controversy in this case centers on the PUC’s authority to order such monitoring in light of section 5703 of the Pennsylvania Wiretapping and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MelilliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Ballou v. State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Boettger v. MiklichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Commonwealth v. HashemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Boettger v. LoverroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Susquehanna Area Regional Airport Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Dance v. COM., PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICECommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Harrisburg Taxicab & Baggage Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API