Legal Opinion

Lehman v. Corpus Christi National Bank

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1984No. C-2537PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPEARS, Justice.

This case involves the construction of a will. The question before us is whether Randy Lehman, an adopted adult, qualifies as a “descendant” of Melvin Lehman, his adoptive father, within the terms of the will of W.F.L. Lehman, Melvin’s father. The trial court held that he did not, and that Keith Lehman, Melvin’s natural son, was entitled under the will to all of his deceased father’s Vi share in the income from the W.F.L. Lehman Estate Trust, set up by the will. The court of appeals affirmed. 665 S.W.2d 799. We reverse those judgments, and render judgment that Randy and Keith…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Shriner's Hospital for Crippled Children of Texas v. StahlTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Huffman v. HuffmanTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Stewart v. SelderTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Taylor v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Gee v. ReadTexas Supreme Court · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. San Antonio Area Foundation v. LangTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Hysaw v. DawkinsTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Kelley v. MarlinTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Ethicon, Inc. v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Humble Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Gomez, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API