Legal Opinion
Jou v. Hamada
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
Decided March 5, 2009No. 27491, 27539PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
NAKAMURA, J.
Under the provisions of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) §§ 386-73 (Supp.2007) and 386-87 (1993) of the Hawaii workers’ compensation law, the parties to a decision by the Director of the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations (the Director) have the right to appeal the Director’s decision to the Labor and Industrial Relations Appeals Board (LIRAB). The Director has promulgated a rule, Hawaii Administrative Rules (HAR) § 12-15-94(d), prohibiting any appeal of the Director’s decisions in billing disputes between employers and medical service providers in…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pauley v. BethEnergy Mines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. ToyomuraHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
- Camara v. AgsaludHawaii Supreme Court · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- AlohaCare v. ItoHawaii Supreme Court · 2012
- Dickinson v. TINGUELY DEVELOPMENTHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2009
- In Re the Care & Treatment of WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- Martin v. GREEN MAGIC, INC.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2009
- Smith v. HAWAII ISLAND HUMANE SOCIETYHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2009